Gun Control Persuasive Essay Example for Free

Gun Control Persuasive EssayI believe that catalysts should not be banned in the US. Guns dont kill people, people kill people. I am incontestable most of us have heard this saying at some point in our lives. Surely, it is a statement of the obvious, but the logic behind it rings true. It may seem rational to ban guns just to prevent people from killing, but it is not the guns themselves that are the problem. That is just a simple solution to a complex problem. The criminals who kill others are perishing to come out the law and risk going to prison for the domicile of their lives to murder, yet they are expected to follow firearm laws? If a nationwide gun ban is enacted, criminals will not suddenly follow the law and reject the thought of buying a firearm on the black market.Banning all guns in the join States would be irrational because it would not lower evil or prevent firearm-related murders. Outlawing firearms punishes the law-abiding citizens by leaving them defen seless against criminals who obtain their firearms il de jure .Protecting yourself with a legally obtained firearm should not be against the law and should me more of a necessity for the safety of your family and property. The Department of rightnesss own discipline Institute of Justice study titled Guns in America National Survey on Private Ownership and Use of Firearms estimated that 1.5 million Americans use guns for defensive purposes every year. sight who commit crimes are already willing to break the law to kill someone, why wouldnt they break the law and buy a firearm off the black market.As weve learned from the war on drugs, prohibiting a particular item only makes a stronger criminal enterprise. It would seem logical that the banning of firearms would lead to less firearms and less crime, but statistics show just the opposite. Washington D.C. has had a handgun ban in effect since 1976. After the ban, D.C.s murder rate only once fell below what it was in 1976. Furthermor e, Washington D.C. has been notorious for being one of the most violent cities in the country. Not only is this the show window in the United States, but the trend continues in other countries around the world. For example, after firearms were banned in England and Wales in 1997, the number of deaths and injuries from gun crime increased 340 percent in the seven years from 1998 to 2005.The rubric that guns are the problem is merely a scapegoat for larger socioeconomic problems such as poerty, drugs, deplorable parenting, and undesirable role models. As for the mass shootings that have become a staple for the fear mongering somatic media, it should be noted that every single mass shooter since columbine had been prescribed serotonin boosting psychiatrical drugs, yet the media seldomly mention this and never correlate it with the crime. Perhaps they dont want to point the fiendish towards their big pharmaceutical sponsors, whose ads bombard you during every commercial break. Fur thermore the media also sensationalizes these shooters making them seem alike martyrs for the next potential shooter. An abundance of registered firearms in the hands of law-abiding citizens acts as a deterrent against crime.The urban center of Kennesaw, Georgia passed an ordinance in March of 1982 requiring each household to own and maintain a gun. Kennesaws crime rate dropped significantly after the ordinance, and there has not been a single murder over the twenty-six years that it has been in effect. The claims that a high gun willpower results in high amounts of military group is nothing more than a fabrication. Switzerland, a country known for having one of the highest rates of gun monomania in the world, also maintains one of the lowest firearm-related crime rates in the world. In areas where gun ownership is high, the threat of an armed civilian acts as a hindrance against the criminal element.Overall, I speculate that the United States will continue to see a reduction i n crime in areas of rising gun ownership. A firearm ban would not stop crime and would only hurt responsible, law-abiding citizens. As long as there is a criminal element, people will always feel the consider to protect themselves against a perceived threat. The second amendment was implemented by the founding fathers of the United States as a fundamental right of the people to protect themselves from all forms of tyranny. The right to keep and bear arms is constituted in American culture, and it will not be going away any time soon.